SB 2320 Drastically Changing DWI Punishments

Opposing SB 2320: A Call for Fair and Balanced Justice

As concerned citizens of Texas, we must voice our opposition to Senate Bill 2320 (SB 2320), which proposes to significantly increase the punishment levels for non-injury Driving While Intoxicated (DWI) offenses. While the intention behind this bill is to enhance road safety, it is crucial to consider the broader implications and potential injustices that could arise from such stringent measures.

Disproportionate Penalties

SB 2320 aims to impose harsher penalties, including longer jail sentences, steeper fines, and stricter probation terms for certain DWI offenses.  While it is understandable while communities want to deter drunk driving, increasing the punishment for non-injury offenses to such an extent may lead to disproportionate consequences for individuals who have not caused harm to others. The focus should be on rehabilitation and prevention rather than excessively punitive measures.

Impact on First-Time Offenders

First-time offenders, who may have made a one-time mistake, could face severe consequences under this bill. SB 2320 could result in long-term negative impacts on people’s lives, including difficulties in finding employment and housing. Instead of having a misdemeanor arrest, a person could being facing a felony arrest if this bill is passed.  A more balanced approach would involve providing support and resources to help individuals make better choices in the future.

This bill aims to make a DWI-Open Container to be bumped up from a class B to class A misdemeanor.  A DWI 2nd, or DWI with an alleged BAC >=.15 at the time of testing would move from class A misdemeanor to state jail felony!

Economic and Social Costs

The implementation of SB 2320 could lead to increased incarceration rates, placing a significant burden on the state’s already strained prison system. The economic costs associated with longer jail sentences and the potential loss of productivity from individuals who are incarcerated for non-injury offenses must be carefully considered. Additionally, the social costs, including the impact on families and communities, cannot be overlooked.

Conclusion

While the goal of reducing drunk driving is commendable, SB 2320’s approach of raising punishment levels for non-injury DWI offenses is not the answer. We must advocate for fair and balanced justice that prioritizes rehabilitation and prevention over excessive punishment. Let us work together to find solutions that truly enhance road safety without causing undue harm to individuals and communities.

Join us in opposing SB 2320 and advocating for a more just and effective approach to addressing DWI offenses in Texas.